Tag Archives: ICMPv6

Wireshark Feature Added: Connecting ICMP Errors

ICMP/ICMPv6, Wireshark, , , ,

It’s really just a small thing, but very practical for me: In Wireshark, a feature request I submitted has been implemented. Now, when you click on an ICMP error, the corresponding (original) packet is highlighted.

Previously, clicking on a packet belonging to a flow would show all related packets, including any ICMP errors. However, if you selected an ICMP error packet itself, nothing happened. If you had many ICMP errors from different sessions, you had to go through the cumbersome process of figuring out which sessions they actually belonged to.

Now, you can simply scroll through the packet list as usual and immediately see whether related packets are present — and if so, which ones. Very handy.

Continue reading Wireshark Feature Added: Connecting ICMP Errors →

Quizauflösung: Fehlersuche mittels ICMP-Rückmeldungen

ICMP/ICMPv6, , , , , , , ,

Die Fehlersuche in IP-Netzwerken fällt nicht leicht, denn einem Netzwerkschluckauf können viele Ursachen zugrunde liegen. Profi-Admins kennen aber Wege, um das klassische und meist aufwendige Troubleshooting abzukürzen. Beispielsweise kann man Fehlerquellen anhand von ICMP-Rückmeldungen der Netzwerkgeräte eingrenzen, die an einem fehlgeschlagenen IP-Dialog beteiligt sind. Welche Meldungen das sind und wie man sie interpretiert, haben wir hier ausführlich beschrieben.

Am Ende dieses Beitrags haben wir vier Netzwerkanalyse-Aufgaben gestellt. Die Grundlage dafür bildet ein Verkehrsmitschnitt, den man mit dem Analysetool Wireshark öffnet und mit einem Display-Filter siebt. Hier folgen die Antworten zu den Aufgaben.

Continue reading Quizauflösung: Fehlersuche mittels ICMP-Rückmeldungen →

ICMP-Meldungen zur Fehlersuche im Netz einspannen

ICMP/ICMPv6, Internet Access, Routing, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sie sind Admin und Ihr Netz kränkelt. Wo fangen Sie an mit der Fehlersuche? Unser Tipp: Tasten Sie Ihre Netzwerkpatienten mal nach ICMP-Symptomen ab. Viele führen direkt zur Ursache.

Wenn man Netzwerkschluckauf behandeln muss, gilt Wireshark als eines der Lieblingswerkzeuge von Netzwerkadmins. Denn falsch angestöpselten oder fehlkonfigurierten Servern kommt man oft schon anhand eines Netzwerkmitschnitts auf die Spur und erspart sich so den Adminzugriff auf Abteilungsrouter oder -switches. Als behandelnder Admin müssen Sie das aufgefangene Paketkonfetti nur noch mit einem geeigneten Display-Filter sieben, um jene Paketsorte im Kescher zu behalten, die Fehlerhinweise gratis unter Ihre wissenden Augen bringt: die ICMP-Päckchen.

Continue reading ICMP-Meldungen zur Fehlersuche im Netz einspannen →

ICMP ‘Destination Unreachable’ Messages @ SharkFest’24 EU

Conference Talks, ICMP/ICMPv6, Internet Access, , , , , , ,

I did a presentation at SharkFest’24 EU in Vienna, the “Wireshark Developer and User Conference“, about the topic: “Unveiling Network Errors – A Deep Dive into ICMP ‘Destination Unreachable’ Messages“. It covers the following:

“Effective troubleshooting of network issues is a critical concern for network technicians. While many are familiar with basic ICMP tools like ping and traceroute, the breadth of ICMP capabilities often goes underutilised. This session delves into ICMP messages, specifically the ‘Destination Unreachable’ type, and the insights they provide into network errors.

We will explore methods for capturing and analysing network traffic, highlighting practical tips and tricks for using Wireshark to diagnose and resolve issues efficiently. Attendees will gain a deeper understanding of ICMP message functions and how to leverage them for improved network troubleshooting.”

You can watch the whole session and download the slides. And you can do the six challenges at the end of the session as well. (The answers are not in the PDF, but shown in the video.)

Continue reading ICMP ‘Destination Unreachable’ Messages @ SharkFest’24 EU →

Path MTU Discovery

ICMP/ICMPv6, Internet Access, Routing, , , , , , ,

One of the mysteries for me in IP networks was the Path MTU Discovery (PMTUD) process. I’ve seldom seen any problems with the MTU at all. Fortunately, while troubleshooting some router issues, I captured several ICMP “packet too big” errors along with the original packets. 👍🏻

Let’s have a look at those PMTUD processes for IPv6 and legacy IP with Wireshark. Of course, these captured connections are part of the Ultimate PCAP as well, hence, you can download the most current version of it and analyze it by yourself.

Continue reading Path MTU Discovery →

Minor Palo Bug: ICMPv6 Errors sourced from Unspecified Address

IPv6, Palo Alto Networks, , , , ,

During my IPv6 classes, I discovered a (minor) bug at the NGFW from Palo Alto Networks: ICMPv6 error messages, such as “time exceeded” (type 3) as a reply of traceroute, or “destination unreachable” (type 1) as a reply of a drop policy, are not correctly sourced from the IPv6 address of the data interface itself, but from the unspecified address “::”. Here are some details:

Continue reading Minor Palo Bug: ICMPv6 Errors sourced from Unspecified Address →

Who sends TCP RSTs?

Design/Policy, ICMP/ICMPv6, Security, , , , , , , , , ,

At SharkFest’22 EU, the Annual Wireshark User and Developer Conference, I attended a beginners’ course called “Network Troubleshooting from Scratch”, taught by the great Jasper Bongertz. In the end, we had some high-level discussions concerning various things, one of them was the insight that TCP RSTs are not only sent from a server in case the port is closed, but are also commonly sent (aka spoofed) from firewalls in case a security policy denies the connection. Key question: Can you distinguish between those spoofed vs. real TCP RSTs? Initially, I thought: no, you can’t, cause the firewalls out there do a great job.

It turned out: you can!

Continue reading Who sends TCP RSTs? →

UK IPv6 Council Spring 2020: Incorrect Working IPv6 Clients & Networks

Conference Talks, IPv6, NTP, , , , ,

I did a short presentation at the spring 2020 roundtable of the UK IPv6 Council. The talk was about a case study I did with my NTP server listed in the NTP Pool project: For 66 days I captured all NTP requests for IPv6 and legacy IP while analyzing the returning ICMPv6/ICMPv4 error messages. (A much longer period than my initial capture for 24 hours.) Following are my presentation slides along with the results.

Continue reading UK IPv6 Council Spring 2020: Incorrect Working IPv6 Clients & Networks →

Incorrect Working IPv6 NTP Clients/Networks

IPv6, NTP, , , , , , , ,

During my analysis of NTP and its traffic to my NTP servers listed in the NTP Pool Project I discovered many ICMP error messages coming back to my servers such as port unreachables, address unreachables, time exceeded or administratively prohibited. Strange. In summary, more than 3 % of IPv6-enabled NTP clients failed in getting answers from my servers. Let’s have a closer look:

Continue reading Incorrect Working IPv6 NTP Clients/Networks →

Wireshark Layer 2-3 pcap Analysis w/ Challenges (CCNP SWITCH)

Cisco Systems, Routing, Switching, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

While preparing for my CCNP SWITCH exam I built a laboratory with 4 switches, 3 routers and 2 workstations in order to test almost all layer 2/3 protocols that are related to network management traffic. And because “PCAP or it didn’t happen” I captured 22 of these protocols to further investigate them with Wireshark. Oh oh, I remember the good old times where I merely used unmanaged layer 2 switches. ;)

In this blogpost I am publishing the captured pcap file with all of these 22 protocols. I am further listing 46 CHALLENGES as an exercise for the reader. Feel free to download the pcap and to test your protocol skills with Wireshark! Use the comment section below for posting your answers.

Of course I am running my lab fully dual-stacked, i.e., with IPv6 and legacy IP. On some switches the SDM template must be changed to be IPv6 capable such as sdm prefer dual-ipv4-and-ipv6 default .

Continue reading Wireshark Layer 2-3 pcap Analysis w/ Challenges (CCNP SWITCH) →