5 thoughts on “IPv6”

1. I like your site. That’s saying a lot as I’m over 60 and have been networking since the 8080. Plus I do html as a hobby, and believe SIMPLE = better = fast. Your site is ‘less-worse’ than others. there’s lots I don’t know and care for though, like pre-fetching and google. They have their dirty little hands in everyone’s pockets, selling their ‘added value’ which is garbage IMHO.

   Do you have your own server ?
   Do your own programming ?
   Use a compiler ?
   Just curious.

   Have you been to cisco’s site lately ? It has got to be the WORST, the slowest, the choppiest, unresponsive site there ever was. 20 years ago web sites were much better.

   Reply

2. Hi,

   you have any solution for the following issue?

   Client with ipv4 and ipv6 connects with Forticlient to a fortigate 6.2 with only ipv4 now the client prefers his ipv6 dns for resolution and fails to lookup any dns request over vpn.

   Fortinet told me the solution is in 7.0
   https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.0.0/new-features/766455/dual-stack-ipv4-and-ipv6-support-for-ssl-vpn

   but there must be another solution?

   Reply

   1. It’s a late and non-satisfying answer, but maybe soneone else finds it:
      we have same issue with FortiOS 6.4 and I didn´t find a solution until now
      We have to replace the unit because it doesn’t support 7.0….

      Reply

3. Hi,

   thanks for the interesting talk on heise

   https://www.heise.de/news/heiseshow-IPv6-setzt-sich-langsam-durch-die-wichtigsten-Fragen-6664196.html

   Best regards

   Florian

   Reply

4. great collection of ipv6 insights on the blog! excited about the upcoming dns64 and nat64 section – those are key for smooth transitions. tools like ipwhois.net make it easy to check ip details and troubleshoot in dual-stack environments. keep up the awesome work!

   Reply