Nping aka Layer 4 Ping

Ping/Traceroute, Tutorial/Howto, , , , , ,

I was missing a generic layer 4 ping in my toolbox. Initially searching for a mere TCP ping, I have found Nping which completely satisfies my needs and gives so much more. ;)

What’s a layer 4 ping, and why? –> A normal ping (= ICMP echo-request) reveals whether the destination IP address, that is: the mere server/VM, is up and running. That’s great for a layer 3 networker since routing to and from the destination is already working. However, it does NOT reveal whether or not a service at layer 4 (TCP or UDP) is up and running as well. That’s what a layer 4 ping is about: sending TCP SYNs to the port in question, waiting for a “SYN ACK” (port is listening) or “RST”/no reply (port is not available). Common use cases: Waiting for a service to start again after an upgrade, or waiting for new firewall policies (to allow or deny) a certain port.

Continue reading Nping aka Layer 4 Ping →

Capturing – because I can: IS-IS, GLBP, VRRP

Cisco Systems, Internet Access, Network, Routing, , , , , , , , ,

I am constantly trying to add more protocols to the Ultimate PCAP. Hence I used some time in my (old) Cisco lab to configure and capture the following protocols: IS-IS, GLBP, and VRRP. And since Alexis La Goutte sent me some CAPWAP traffic, this protocol is also added. All packets are now found in another update of the Ultimate PCAP. Here are some details:

Continue reading Capturing – because I can: IS-IS, GLBP, VRRP →

Zweite Philips Hue Bridge: Was ein Schmodder

Commentary, DIY/Bastelarbeiten, , ,

Seit mehreren Jahren nutze ich Lampen von Philips Hue. Natürlich nicht nur Lampen, sondern auch Relais, Steckdosen, allerlei Schalter, Taster, sowie Hue Labs, Routinen, die Integration mit IFTTT, usw. Entsprechend bin ich leider bereits bei 30 Lampen (von angepriesenen 50) an die 100 % der verbrauchten Regeln gekommen. Ok, das wurde im Hueblog schon vor längerer Zeit beschrieben.

Gut, den Drops muss ich leider lutschen, kaufte mir eine 2. Hue Bridge und gut is. Denkste. Die Integration einer 2. Bridge ist leider alles andere als gut:

Continue reading Zweite Philips Hue Bridge: Was ein Schmodder →

Adding some packets: RARP, SNAP, MPLS & More

Network, , , , , , , , , , ,

The other day I was searching for a trace file with a decent protocol mix that could be used to introduce a few colleagues to Wireshark. This brought me to Johannes Weber and his Ultimate PCAP.

To get a first impression of a trace file I used Wireshark’s protocol hierarchy – and boy, that’s a lot of protocols. This was not exactly what I was looking for: This single trace file holds snippets from 2014 to 2020 with a myriad of protocols and IP networks. Unfortunately, it’s nothing like the protocol mix found in a network analysis project.

Nevertheless, the trace file caught my interest as a long time Wireshark user. After nearly 20 years of network analysis, I had my own collection of traces with a few odd frames. To my big surprise, I had recorded a few protocols that are not yet part of the Ultimate PCAP.

So here is my small contribution to this collection:

Continue reading Adding some packets: RARP, SNAP, MPLS & More →

Route-Based VPN Tunnel FortiGate <-> Cisco ASA

Cisco Systems, Fortinet, IPsec/VPN, , , , , ,

More than 6 years ago (!) I published a tutorial on how to set up an IPsec VPN tunnel between a FortiGate firewall and a Cisco ASA. As time flies by, ASA is now able to terminate route-based VPN tunnels (which is great!), we have IKEv2 running everywhere and enhanced security proposals. Hence, it’s time for an update:

Continue reading Route-Based VPN Tunnel FortiGate <-> Cisco ASA →

Route-Based VPN Tunnel Palo Alto <-> Cisco ASA

Cisco Systems, IPsec/VPN, Palo Alto Networks, , , , ,

More than 6 years ago (!) I published a tutorial on how to set up an IPsec VPN tunnel between a Palo Alto Networks firewall and a Cisco ASA. As time flies by, ASA is now able to terminate route-based VPN tunnels (which is great!), we have IKEv2 running everywhere and enhanced security proposals. Hence, it’s time for an update:

Continue reading Route-Based VPN Tunnel Palo Alto <-> Cisco ASA →

FortiGate bug: firewalls sending excessive requests to the NTP Pool

Fortinet, NTP, , , , , ,

The NTP Pool is a volunteer organization that provides time synchronization service to hundreds of millions of computers worldwide. A typical client might query a particular NTP Pool server ~10-60 times/hour. Wikipedia lists some abusive clients that far exceeded the normal rate. This wastes NTP server resources, may interfere with other clients, and can trigger DDoS protections. In late 2019, a software update made some FortiGate firewalls very unfriendly to the NTP Pool.

Continue reading FortiGate bug: firewalls sending excessive requests to the NTP Pool →

NTS Published as Standard

Authentication, NTP, , , , ,

This is a guest blogpost by Martin Langer, Ph.D. student for “Secured Time Synchronization Using Packet-Based Time Protocols” at Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Germany.

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) published the Network Time Security protocol (NTS) as RFC 8915 on October 1, 2020. This new standard offers security mechanisms for the widely used Network Time Protocol v4 (NTPv4), which has been operated mostly unsecured until now. After almost eight years of development, global collaboration, and many interoperability tests of leading NTP software developers, NTS represents a mature security protocol. In this post, I’ll give you a short overview of the development progress of NTS and provide a list of public implementations and NTS secured time servers…

Continue reading NTS Published as Standard →

iperf3 on a FortiGate

Bandwidth/Delay, Fortinet, Internet Access, Monitoring, , , ,

This is a really nice feature: you can run iperf3 directly on a FortiGate to speed-test your network connections. It’s basically an iperf3 client. Using some public iperf servers you can test your Internet bandwidth; using some internal servers you can test your own routed/switched networks, VPNs, etc. However, the maximum throughput for the test is CPU dependent. So please be careful when interpreting the results. Here we go:

Continue reading iperf3 on a FortiGate →

NTP Filtering (Delay & Blockage) in the Internet

NTP, , , , , , , ,

NTP (Network Time Protocol) messages are sometimes rate-limited or blocked entirely by Internet operators. This little-known “NTP filtering” was put into place several years ago in response to DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks. NTP filtering may drop NTP messages based on rate or message size. Let’s dig into it: Continue reading NTP Filtering (Delay & Blockage) in the Internet →

A Little Printing Please – Packet Capture

iPhone/iPad, Network, , , , , ,

Uh, I wasn’t aware of so many different printing protocols. Do you? While I was trying to solve a little printing problem I took a packet capture of three different printing variants over TCP/IP: Raw via TCP port 9100, LPD/LPR via TCP port 515, and Apple’s AirPrint which uses the Internet Printing Protocol IPP. As always, you can download this pcap and have a look at it by yourself.

Continue reading A Little Printing Please – Packet Capture →

Palo Alto GRE Tunnel

Network, Palo Alto Networks, , ,

Since PAN-OS version 9.0 you can configure GRE tunnels on a Palo Alto Networks firewall. Greetings from the clouds. As always, this is done solely through the GUI while you can use some CLI commands to test the tunnel. This time Palo put a little stumbling block in there as you have to allow a GRE connection with a certain zone/IP reference. I will show how to set up such a GRE tunnel between a Palo and a Cisco router. Here we go:

Continue reading Palo Alto GRE Tunnel →

Certificate Transparency & Alternative Name Disclosure

Certificate, , , , , , ,

Maybe you’ve heard of Certificate Transparency and its log. Citing Wikipedia: “Certificate Transparency (CT) is an Internet security standard and open source framework for monitoring and auditing digital certificates.” Basically, it gives you information about any public certificate that is issued. Besides its advantages, I thought of one possible problem as it leaks all FQDNs to the public when using TLS certificates, for example from Let’s Encrypt.

A similar problem might arise when using a single X.509 certificate with a couple of DNS names (subject alternative name SAN) from which one should be kept “private”. It will be publicly known as well.

Hence I made a self-experiment in which I generated two certificates with random names, monitoring the authoritative DNS servers as well as the IPv6 addresses of those names in order to check who is resolving/connecting to otherwise unknown hostnames. Here we go:

Continue reading Certificate Transparency & Alternative Name Disclosure →